NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

VS

NVIDIA Quadro CX NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages

Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages

Released 9 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock1560MHz

More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)

4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro CX

0.462 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +3012%

14.38 TFLOPS

Quadro CX

VS

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Aug 2018

Quadro CX

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1305 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

800 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

76.80GB/s

Bandwidth

672.0GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

72

-

Compute Units

-

192

Shading Units

4608

64

TMUs

288

24

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

576

-

RT Cores

72

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

192 KB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

149.8 GPixel/s

38.53 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

449.3 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

28.75 TFLOPS

462.3 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

14.38 TFLOPS

57.79 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

TU102

-

GPU Variant

TU102-875-A1

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Board Design

150W

TDP

260W

450 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

7.5

4.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

2

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

3

NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

4

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA A10G

5

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

6

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

7

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

8

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID K200

9

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

10

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

Related News

1

Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan

2

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

3

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

4

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

5

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

6

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

7

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

8

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

9

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

10

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs