Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +751%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro CX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2688
64
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy