CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+18337%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy