Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +18337%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy