Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 +477%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
24
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT200B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy