Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +2611%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy