Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 24GB VRAM Tesla M40 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1112MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla M40 24 GB +8440%
6.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Maxwell
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
948 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1112 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.832 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM200
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GM200-895-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy