Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +2132%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM206
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy