Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M +741%
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
837 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy