Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +6523%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
1920
16
TMUs
120
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU106
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy