Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800 +677%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
189W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT200B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy