Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +4341%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK110B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy