Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M +978%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM108
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy