Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M +615%
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G92
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy