Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +13888%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA107S
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy