CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+24900%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy