Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +24900%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy