Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1506MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Tesla P6 +10355%
6.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1012 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy