Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +44788%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
14336
16
TMUs
896
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
UMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
100 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy