Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q +2212%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK104
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy