Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +1811%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
924 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GM204
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy