Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 +390%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
8
32
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GF100
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy