Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1442MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +10344%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GP100
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy