Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +2043%
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GM206
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy