Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +4982%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GP104
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy