CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+52859%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
VS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
UMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
100 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID M40
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy