Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +1108%
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GP107
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy