Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +22758%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
6656
16
TMUs
416
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Aldebaran
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy