Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +12314%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Vega 10
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy