Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +13445%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Vega 20
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy