Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +3459%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2496
16
TMUs
208
8
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK110
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy