Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
8128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +8280%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy