Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +4982%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GP104
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy