Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +5928%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
56
64
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
12
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GP100
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy