Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
16312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +32264%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
72
Shading Units
16384
24
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
100 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy