Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +350%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G94
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy