Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +35159%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
70
48
Shading Units
4480
24
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Navi 31
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy