CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+4698%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
7680
48
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy