Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +4698%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
7680
48
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy