Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +653%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy