CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+5021%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
8192
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GRID K340
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GRID K100
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy