Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +3005%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
20
96
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GP104
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy