Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1739%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
1920
48
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU106
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy