Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
9152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
A10G +19600%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
72
64
Shading Units
9216
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA102
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy