Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +8581%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
108
64
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA100
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy