Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
13248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +28187%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
13312
32
TMUs
832
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Aldebaran
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy