Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +11881%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
48
64
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
AD104
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy