Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +8843%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
46
64
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy