Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 24GB VRAM Tesla T40 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla T40 24 GB +8887%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Turing
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
624.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
72
64
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU102
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy