Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
6904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +114547%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
80GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
108
8
Shading Units
6912
4
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy