CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A10M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA A10M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
A10M
+137782%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
A10M
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
56
8
Shading Units
7168
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy