Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +4211%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy