Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
16376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +308311%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
1024
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy